9/21 EMA Cross: claimed vs measured

67.2% is the win rate claimed for 9/21 ema cross by investorguidefinder. We ran the rule inside a wider sweep of indicator tests: 0 of 6,428 tests survived once corrected for how many rules were tested.

Method. The 9-period EMA crossing above the 21-period EMA, long only, the trend-following entry as taught in the source making the claim, run inside a larger sweep of indicator rules across assets, timeframes and confluence combinations.

Data. 40 assets across 6 timeframes, scored with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery correction across all 6,428 cells in that sweep, not judged cell by cell.

This is one line in a wider check: Tickfloor's research desk has run 351 strategies against buy-and-hold, and after correcting for how many were tested (Benjamini-Hochberg, 394 tests), 0 survived. A single win-rate claim like this one is exactly the kind of result that check exists to catch before anyone trades on it.

General information only. It doesn't consider your objectives, finances or needs. Tickfloor holds no financial services licence and never places trades.

What win rate does 9/21 EMA Cross claim online?

67.2% win rate, per <a href="https://investorguidefinder.com/trading-strategies.php">investorguidefinder</a>.

What did Tickfloor measure for 9/21 EMA Cross?

0 of 6,428 tests survived, once corrected for the number of rules tested in the same sweep.

Is this a claim about Tickfloor's own accuracy?

No. This measures a publicly claimed strategy rule, not Tickfloor's agreement score. Tickfloor makes no win-rate or accuracy claim about itself.

See the full method and every result or the strategy family index.

See a full worked example, free, no account. Or start lesson 1 of the course, also free.